The 20th century has been dubbed the "Age of Genocide" by
some historians because in that century alone more than 60 million people
fell victim to state-sponsored killing, with ethnic cleansings and purges
in countries such as Germany, Ukraine, Cambodia, East Timor, Rwanda and
the former Yugoslavia. Of course this was not a new phenomenon. The slaughter
of Native Americans has been one of the most massive and longest lasting
genocides in history.
It’s important for us to acknowledge that most of these genocides
were led by Christian and other religious groups. In many cases it has
been the fusion of Christian beliefs with ethnic and national identities
that has contributed to the killing.
The Christian church should know better. After all every Christmas we
are reminded that our faith began in the context of genocide which Jesus
only marginally survived. However rather than learning from that beginning,
the Christian church response was deafening silence, compliance and resignation
to mass murder during the Holocaust and genocide in Rwanda and Bosnia.
In Rwanda the Hutus killed more than 500,000 Tutsis. Some of the worst
massacres occurred in churches and mission compounds and it’s quite
likely that some clergy even participated in the killing.
James Waller is professor of psychology at Whitworth College in Washington
and is a scholar in the field of Holocaust and genocide studies. He wrote
a book called “Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Can Commit Genocide
and Mass Killing.”
Waller argues that in each of the 20th century genocides that involved
Christian ideology the church provided a theological justification for
an "us versus them" mentality. Having created that separation
Christians tend to abandon their moral obligation to help persecuted
people.
Although the church typically has made official declarations of contrition
in the wake of genocide, Waller said these lacked any real self-analysis
or acceptance of culpability. The church seems to assume that a self-critique
doesn't matter because genocide "won't happen again."
As evidence that Christian intervention can make a difference, Waller
points to an event in the early stages of the Holocaust. Before Hitler
began killing Jews, he gassed hundreds of Germans who had physical or
mental disabilities. The church spoke out against Hitler's actions, and
the killings stopped. Later, however, when Hitler began killing Jews,
the church was silent.
"To what degree can Christian institutions redeem themselves--and
the world--by being involved in post-genocidal reconciliation?" Waller
asked. Above all, he said, Christian communities should think about what
the church did wrong and what it can do differently next time, because "there
will be a next time."
Well, we are in the midst of one of those next times right now in Sudan.
How will the church respond this time? Or more to the point this morning,
how does our theology stand up under inspection in the light of genocide?
Best selling author and born again Christian Anne Lamott said it well, "You
can safely assume that you've created God in your own image, when it
turns out that God hates all the same people you do."
As inheritors of the Hebrew God, we have some tough thinking to do.
If we read the Hebrew Scriptures literally we find evidence for a Jihad
well before the Koran was even written.
Deuteronomy and Joshua record one of at least four genocides in the
Old Testament at the command of God. After wandering in the desert for
four decades, God ordered the Hebrews to invade the "promised land" and
totally exterminate "the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites,
and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites" leaving "alive
nothing that breathes." They were to murder the elderly, women,
infants and newborn. The writings of Joshua tell chapter by chapter of
the demise of each city and its people.
Exodus 32 records God ordering 'each man to strap a sword to his side.
Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, he says,
each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.' The Levites did as
Moses commanded and that day about three thousand of the people died."
Notice that I said, “If we read the Scriptures literally.” If
we don’t read the scriptures literally then why do so many Christians
still cling to a literal belief in a God who is “out there somewhere” calling
the shots of history’s happenings.
Something has got to give!
Some of you might remember the 1960s Bob Dylan song called “God
on our Side.”
These are some of the words.
Oh the First World War, boys
It closed out its fate
The reason for fighting
I never got straight
But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side.
When the Second World War
Came to an end
We forgave the Germans
And then we were friends
Though they murdered six million
In the ovens they fried
The Germans now too
Have God on their side.
I've learned to hate Russians
All through my whole life
If another war starts
It's them we must fight
To hate them and fear them
To run and to hide
And accept it all bravely
With God on my side.
But now we got weapons
Of the chemical dust
If fire them we're forced to
Then fire them we must
One push of the button
And a shot the world wide
And you never ask questions
When God's on your side.
In a many dark hour
I've been thinkin' about this
That Jesus Christ
Was betrayed by a kiss
But I can't think for you
You'll have to decide
Whether Judas Iscariot
Had God on his side.
The ultimate question for us this morning is whether we believe that God is
on our side, and if so what God is it that we are speaking about?
The author and satirist Quentin Crisp was giving a speech to a group
in Northern Ireland. He explained to the audience that he was an atheist.
A woman in the audience stood up and said, "Yes, but is it the God
of the Catholics or the God of the Protestants in whom you don't believe?"
The question is on my mind almost every time I hear someone use the
word ‘God’. Which God are you referring to, the object God
or some subject called God, the God who is one, or a God who is all and
in all? The God who acts upon us, or a God who is in our actions.
Bring those questions with you now to the tragedy of the Holocaust.
How did the Holocaust challenge and change our theology?
Is it responsible to continue the mythology about a God who has a special
purpose for one nation or another in the light of the Holocaust?
In my opinion if we continue to believe in a God something like the
Hebrew God of interventions and wars, then we betray the honor of all
those lost in that mass murder. We dishonor the victims, as we leave
open the possibility of another mass murder where God is once again on
the side of the perpetrator. Belief in this God may be self serving,
it may be convenient. It may even be profitable. However it is also irresponsible
in the light of the damage done in the name of that God.
The ‘death of God’ movement of the 1960s was the first to
systematize a theology where God did not exist in the heavens and interact
with the world from afar. Instead Bishop John Robinson and others began
picking up Paul Tillich’s phrase ‘ground of being’ to
describe the metaphysical reality of God in our world and our lives.
Bishop Spong has been the most articulate spokesperson for this form
of non theism in our generation.
The ‘death of God’ theologians claimed the writings of Dietrich
Bonhoeffer to state their case. Bonhoeffer washanged by the Nazi government
in 1945 for activities in opposition to the German state. Bonhoeffer
coined the phrase ‘religionless Christianity’. He wrote this
in a letter from Prison, “on the one hand we have the deism of
Descartes, who holds that the world is a mechanism, running by itself
with no interference from God; and on the other hand the pantheism of
Spinoza, who says that God is nature. In the last resort, Kant is a deist,
and Fichte and Hegel are pantheists. Everywhere the thinking is directed
towards the autonomy of man and the world.” Bonhoeffer seemed to
think it was a natural progression for people to begin living as if there
were no God.
Stop and think about it. A man who out of his Christian convictions
was in prison and facing death was coming to the view that we need God
less as we evolve. It is not an argument against the existence of God
but a statement of optimism about human potential to live with goodness
as they enact the qualities of the good God. It is not about a
God that does not exist, but rather understanding in a different and
new way that we do not need God as much as we did. We have all
that we need in our rational abilities, our natural processes and in
our collective consciousness.
It has to be said that even Bonhoeffer was limited by his own prejudices.
He did a great work in resisting evil in the form of the Nazi Government.
He put out the boldest of challenges to churches to resist evil. However
he still seemed to hold to the view that Jewish people were destined
to eventually see the light and accept Jesus as the Messiah. He seemed
to hold to the view that Christianity had superseded Judaism in history
and in the eyes of God. Bonhoeffer was still a theist, or maybe
becoming a deist and this led to his belief in God’s salvation
plan with a national bias. However keep in mind that he died at age 39.
We can only wonder where his great mind and passion would have led him
if he had another 30 years to ponder these matters.
The great breakthrough in Bonhoeffer’s theology was the bottom
up approach. Other great survivors of the Holocaust echoed this same
approach. It urged people to stop asking where God is in the suffering
and tragedy and instead encouraged the question, ‘Where is the
church in suffering and tragedy’ or even closer to home, ‘where
are we in human suffering and tragedy?’
This is where our service today aims to direct us- not ‘out there’ as
if in search of some mythical God. Rather it aims to direct our attention
horizontally.
Let me tell you that putting together this week’s service was
a traumatic experience. Sifting through personal stories of death and
survival and coming to terms with the horror of genocide was almost too
much to bear. I hope that some of this desperation comes through in the
liturgy. It’s a reality which we cannot avoid. I also had some
moments of great inspiration as I read and listened to stories of forgiveness
and love overcoming fear. So I also hope that you take out of the service
today at least glimpses of hope in the midst of the despair.
If there is a point to celebrating Lent in a modern day church, this
would be it. To go deep into suffering, anything from personal loss right
through to genocide, and to find glimpses of hope when you stand at the
brink of being overwhelmed by darkness.
The glimpses of hope arrive for us when another human being stands in
our shoes and walks a step or two, or even a mile or two.
The glimpses of hope arrive when we keep the spirit of victims alive
by remembering them.
Last month, on January 27, the sixtieth anniversary of the liberation
of Auschwitz was held on Holocaust Memorial Day. At this moving commemoration,
grandchildren of the 600 Holocaust survivors who were there read the
names of some 3,000 men and women, all relatives of those survivors or
family members who perished in the Holocaust. It was a symbolic way to
counter the facelessness that the Nazis so desired for the Jewish People.
And, as if to articulate this still further, the commemoration ended
with words written on a postcard by a 22 year-old Jewish electrician,
David Berger, as he faced death, trapped in the Wilna Ghetto in Poland,
late in 1941. He had addressed the postcard to his girlfriend, Else,
and it said simply this: "I should like someone to remember that
there once lived a person named David Berger."
Glimpses of hope.
Mary Rothschild is the daughter of an Auschwitz survivor and now a human
rights activist. She has devoted her life to studying the psychological
and social effects of war on survivors and on the generations that follow.
She has interviewed hundreds of Holocaust survivors, published numerous
articles on the psychological and biochemical effects of trauma, explored
various avenues for healing, and has spoken widely about these issues.
Ms. Rothschild is a trained facilitator for One by One, a nonprofit organization
dedicated to healing the wounds of genocide and war through engaged dialogue
between victims/survivors, perpetrators, bystanders, resisters, and their
descendants.
I listened to a profound interview with Mary during the week. She described
a series of miracles that led her on this path of activism. Her first
miracle occurred in a Jewish German dialogue, and she realized for the
first time that they were not their to forgive the unforgivable, simply
to address it. Her second miracle was to be in Germany and hear the words ‘I’m
sorry’ for the first time. Her third miracle was to hear the pain
of the descendants of the German perpetrators and as she was side by
side with them to feel compassion for their suffering.
Glimpses of hope.
A glimpse of hope is seen when one person, one church stands up for
justice, or when our international community takes a stand against genocide
A glimpse of hope is seen when our ideology, our language shifts to
reflect the equality of all human beings, all races and all religions
and a glimpse of hope arrives every time we unmask propaganda and imperial
language for what it is.
The glimpse of hope is seen every time we banish any notion of ‘other’ from
our psyche.
This is not about atheism. Its about experiencing God in the stuff of
life; both in the darkness and in the glimpses of light and hope.
God who is within all human beings is a spark for love and goodness.
God who is within is a spark for human creativity.
God who is between is love shared and communities of activism. God who
is between is the interconnected stories we share.
God who is beyond our current understanding stretches our belief in
what is possible. God is like our reach which exceeds our grasp. God
is more than the sum of all the parts.
Theology has never been the same since the Holocaust. The literalism
and dogma have been undone, and what has opened up instead is the possibility
of love beyond our imagination. Theology is more now than it ever was.
Now it includes our everyday human experience and interaction. Now it
includes our activism and advocacy. Now it includes you.
This morning I want to offer you the ultimate encouragement – you
can be part of the failure of any future attempted genocide. You
can resist genocide in your every day life by living for goodness. Goodness
will overcomes fear. It always does. I can guarantee that.
There will be victims along the way. Fear always has its victims. However
fear won’t win. It can’t stand up to the power of people
like you and me living with such an awareness of our human companionship
that our togetherness will always outnumber the isolation of fear. Fear
by nature travels solo. It’s too paranoid to work in community.
Fear always brings about its own demise eventually. Power and personalities
make sure of that. Communities of love will win. Communities of Jewish
people the world around prove this point every day. In so doing they
honor victims and confound bigotry.
I come to the end, and like Bonhoeffer know that this is really a beginning.
“From the remains of the victims, like grains of wheat, a new
life must rise up. Auschwitz must become a place that reminds the world
of the dignity of man and that makes each of us responsible for world
peace. As then men and women and children arrived here from all over
Europe to die, so now from here the proclamation of human dignity must
be taken to the whole world. As then many people were at the service
of death, so now we are all called to stand for peace, forgiveness, solidarity.” (unknown
author)